Japhet Amador posted the best MXL performance for the second straight seasonAs we are working on our team prospect lists, I thought we would provide a little diversion by posting the Mexican Summer League performance scores this week. We will take a look at Division I baseball performances next week, before we begin our team-by-team look at the prospect rankings. This year’s Mexican League was once again led by a player that we have been touting for a couple of seasons now—Japhet Amador.
A couple of things to remember about our Performance evaluations: 1) these are not necessarily prospect lists. While it is fair to assume that the best prospects will put up the best performances, these lists focus only on a player’s offensive performance while they were in the league during the 2010 season. They do not consider things like defensive ability, offense vs. required offense for a given position, or projectability. Prospect evaluation is a combination of art and science and this is the science part of that equation. Later in the fall, we will breakdown each team’s ‘prospects’ and rank them in ‘prospect value’ order. 2) What it is, is a comparative statistical look at each players performance, placed in context of their age, their home park, and the league. We rate each player in the five categories that we have found most significant in predicting future Major League performance. The players that rate the highest, have assembled the best ‘Performance’ in these areas. For a more detailed look at the statistics involved you can refer to previous articles on the site (http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/2009/09/do-it-yourself-quantitative-examination.html).
A quick note about the rankings…The TOTAL is the weighted numerical value of the combined statistics that we use. It is scaled for the level of play. Typically, a player with a positive score will rank in the top 1% - 2% of all Minor League players. After the total we list the sub-scores in 4 areas of significance. These scores are presented, for ease of understanding, in a typical 20-80 scouting format. They represent how the individual player performed in those areas in relation to THE LEAGUE in question. A score of 50 represents league average. Players listed as ‘DNQ’ did not qualify for the rankings because of their limited playing time, but we felt their scores were worth noting. If you have further questions on the methodology, feel free to email me at baseballnumbers@ix.netcom.com.
A couple of things to remember about our Performance evaluations: 1) these are not necessarily prospect lists. While it is fair to assume that the best prospects will put up the best performances, these lists focus only on a player’s offensive performance while they were in the league during the 2010 season. They do not consider things like defensive ability, offense vs. required offense for a given position, or projectability. Prospect evaluation is a combination of art and science and this is the science part of that equation. Later in the fall, we will breakdown each team’s ‘prospects’ and rank them in ‘prospect value’ order. 2) What it is, is a comparative statistical look at each players performance, placed in context of their age, their home park, and the league. We rate each player in the five categories that we have found most significant in predicting future Major League performance. The players that rate the highest, have assembled the best ‘Performance’ in these areas. For a more detailed look at the statistics involved you can refer to previous articles on the site (http://baseballnumbers-diamondfutures.blogspot.com/2009/09/do-it-yourself-quantitative-examination.html).
A quick note about the rankings…The TOTAL is the weighted numerical value of the combined statistics that we use. It is scaled for the level of play. Typically, a player with a positive score will rank in the top 1% - 2% of all Minor League players. After the total we list the sub-scores in 4 areas of significance. These scores are presented, for ease of understanding, in a typical 20-80 scouting format. They represent how the individual player performed in those areas in relation to THE LEAGUE in question. A score of 50 represents league average. Players listed as ‘DNQ’ did not qualify for the rankings because of their limited playing time, but we felt their scores were worth noting. If you have further questions on the methodology, feel free to email me at baseballnumbers@ix.netcom.com.
2010 Mexican League Top Hitting Performances
Name Team POS TOTAL Reach Base Strike Zone Judgement Power Speed
1 ) Japhet Amador , MEX , 1B - 0.41 … 58 … 51 … 79 … 40
2 ) Leonardo Heras , REY , CF - 0.34 … 70 … 68 … 39 … 71
3 ) Antonio Lamas , MVA , SS - (0.16) … 31 … 61 … 48 … 65
4 ) Cesar Osuna , CAM , 3B - (0.27) … 21 … 73 … 46 … 38
5 ) Roberto Valencia , CAM , RF - (0.37) … 73 … 76 … 26 … 53
6 ) Jose Orozco , VER , OF - (0.47) … 36 … 26 … 66 … 36
7 ) Sandy Madera , YUC , 1B - (0.49) … 73 … 68 … 80 … 77
8 ) Ramon Ramirez , LAG , OF - (0.55) … 52 … 28 … 47 … 45
9 ) Jose Chavez , VER , 2B - (0.58) … 70 … 45 … 69 … 75
10 ) Ricardo Serrano , PUE , 2B - (0.65) … 34 … 60 … 68 … 38
11 ) Eduardo Arredondo , MEX , CF - (0.66) … 68 … 78 … 37 … 72
12 ) Sergio Perez , MTY , OF - (0.67) … 62 … 40 … 30 … 50
13 ) Sergio Garcia , VER , OF - (0.69) … 23 … 20 … 51 … 80
DNQ Ali Solis , TIG , C - 0.30 … 62 … 47 … 79 … 31
DNQ Eliezer Ortiz , PUE , OF - (0.55) … 22 … 31 … 78 … 72
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment